Pelo título: As lágrimas de Fawkes podem ter curado o diário de Tom Riddle depois que Harry o esfaqueou com uma presa de Basilisco?
Como foi apontado para mim em Por que o Basilisco não mordeu o Livro Dois? Destrua a Horcrux , quando Harry apunhalou o diário Horcrux com a presa Basilisk, o diário não foi destruído instantaneamente; poderia ter havido tempo para Fawkes chorar na facada "ferida".
[...] without thinking, without considering, as though he had meant to do it all along, Harry seized the Basilisk fang on the floor next to him and plunged it straight into the heart of the book.
There was a long, dreadful, piercing scream. Ink spurted out of the diary in torrents, streaming over Harry’s hands, flooding the floor. Riddle was writhing and twisting, screaming and flailing and then ...
He had gone. Harry’s wand fell to the floor with a clatter and there was silence. Silence except for the steady drip drip of ink still oozing from the diary. The Basilisk venom had burned a sizzling hole right through it.
Chamber of Secrets - page 237 - British Hardcover - chapter 17, The Heir of Slytherin
Então, teria sido possível para as lágrimas de Fawkes terem curado o diário mortalmente ferido Horcrux?
Além disso, as lágrimas podem ter sido capazes de neutralizar o veneno do Basilisco, mas o veneno JÁ fez o estrago no caderno - não foi como se estivesse se espalhando lentamente pelo caderno com o fluxo de sangue (como estava acontecendo com Harry). ) fazendo mais dano.
Uma ferida é dano à carne viva. Embora o diário contivesse uma parte da alma de Voldemort, não era feito de carne viva e, portanto, não poderia ter sido "curado" dessa maneira. Talvez um feitiço para consertar um objeto físico (como Hermione usado incessantemente nos óculos de Harry) teria funcionado.
Sim, as lágrimas teriam reparado o diário
Q: When Harry was stabbed by a basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, since he was a Horcrux, shouldn't it have been destroyed then?
JKR: I have been asked that a lot. Harry was exceptionally fortunate in that he had Fawkes. So before he could be destroyed without repair, which is what is necessary to destroy a horcrux, he was mended. However, I made sure that Fawkes wasn't around the second time a Horcrux got stabbed by a basilisk fang, so the poison did its work and it was irreparable within a short period of time.... I established early in the book, Hermione says that you destroy a Horcrux by using something so powerful that there's no remedy. But she does say there is a remedy for basilisk poison but of course it has to be administered immediately and when they stab the cup later - boy I'm really blowing this for anyone who hasn't finished the book - there's Fawkes, is my answer. And thank you for giving me a chance to say that because people have argued that quite a lot.
JK Rowling at Carnegie Hall 10.20.07
Em Relíquias da Morte - O Carniçal De Pijama:
“It doesn’t have to be a basilisk fang,” said Hermione patiently. “It has to be something so destructive that the Horcrux can’t repair itself. Basilisk venom only has one antidote, and it’s incredibly rare — “— phoenix tears,” said Harry, nodding. “Exactly,” said Hermione.
Isso me faz pensar que os Horcruxes estão vivos o suficiente para que possam ser reparados . Assim, as lágrimas dos Fauxes poderiam ter consertado o diário da Horcrux; mas como @DVK apontou que o dano já foi feito no diário.
As lágrimas da fênix são capazes de selar a ferida infligida em harry e purgar o veneno. Mas não há vida para curar, nem carne para selar no Diário, apenas magia negra. E magia negra teria sido necessária para "curar" o diário .
Tags harry-potter voldemort horcrux