Em Before I Fall, o personagem principal realmente tem que fazer isso?

4
Recentemente eu assisti o filme da Netflix, Before I Fall, sobre uma garota presa em um loop de tempo no dia dos namorados, onde ela acaba em um acidente de carro.

No final ela decide

to jump in front of the truck that Juliette, a pariah girl she and her friends mocked through high school, had jumped to herself in the previous loops. Doing so, she saves Juliet and ends the loop. (It's not officially said but I guess this ends the loop and let her be dead for good.)

Ela realmente precisava fazer isso?

I mean, commiting suicide.

Parece que ela ficou impressionada com a ideia depois de sua conversa com o personagem, embora a ação real que ela toma pareça mais um reflexo, ela se comporta como se fosse premeditada.

Qual foi a coisa real que precisou acontecer para terminar o ciclo?

Was it the sacrifice she made to save Juliet, to maybe have absolution for what she and the others did to her Or was it merely preventing juliet from killing herself, and just maybe tying her down would have done the trick?

Eu acho que a resposta é bem subjetiva, mas talvez eu tenha perdido as coisas no filme que insinuaram uma ou outra (ou talvez uma terceira opção?)

    
por Eregrith 22.08.2018 / 16:09

1 resposta

A morte só terminará o ciclo quando for o único caminho. Além disso, está escrito no livro.

No Groundhog Day Phil - o personagem principal

tries to kill himself to end the loop, but he has unfinished tasks to complete and the purpose of the time loop is to complete them, therefore his death isn't the answer.

Em Feliz Dia da Morte

tree repeatedly dies while trying to find her killer, but she lives another day, because she also has unfinished tasks to complete that won't allow her death to be the answer.

Basicamente, embora Sam possa ter encontrado outra maneira de salvar Julia, foi o que ela precisou fazer, porque o loop terminou. Sua tarefa de salvar Julia estava completa, e ela se sacrificou por isso - cabendo considerar que ela era parte da razão pela qual ela estava tentando cometer suicídio em primeiro lugar.

Se houvesse outra maneira, o loop provavelmente a mandaria de volta para encontrar outro caminho, e embora talvez ela não devesse ter começado algo que ela não pudesse terminar com sua paixão, ela provavelmente pensou que era melhor deixá-lo com algo do que deixá-lo com ele sem nunca saber o mesmo.

Isto é de uma entrevista com o diretor-Russo Young - sobre o final, e acontece que no livro ela estava morta o tempo todo:

"People who haven't read the book may be surprised by the ending -- I certainly was. Was there ever any point in the process where you consider making any big changes to that ending?"

"Not really. It was kind of like a joke, almost. Because the book is so clear from the very beginning that she's dead, and the movie actually is pretty clear from the get-go that she's dead, too. Lauren's thing from the very beginning was, "The way to f**k up this movie is to make her live." That was so clear, and that was something that producer Jon Shestack and I talked about a lot. Like, the Hollywood ending of this movie, in the most clichéd sense, is like, And she opens her eyes at the end. And did we shoot that? Ab-so-lutely! With the intention of using it? Not at all. We were like, "Let's shoot it to have it and then try to not use it." Because that's not what the DNA of this project wants to be [or] what this movie is."

Fonte: link

    
22.08.2018 / 16:37