Pergunta feita em Money SE sobre conversa em ternos S04 E0 4 :
You do that, it triggers a stock split.
His shares double in voting power.
Yours don't.
Minha pergunta:
Eu nunca entendi isso. Se você possui 20% das ações antes da divisão, você possui 20% das ações logo após a divisão; estou errado?
it sounds like they are describing something akin to a "poison pill". In these arrangements, the "pill" is triggered by some predefined condition, say a party acquiring shares in excess of a defined threshold. What typically happens is that shareholders other than the ones who triggered the pill get a chance to buy shares at a substantial discount, thereby diluting the shares of the party that triggered it. Because the other shareholders have to buy their additional shares, albeit at a discount, and because it applies only to certain shares, it's not really a split, but it's close enough that the writers of the show may have felt it was worth using the term that is more familiar to the public.
Então Rachel Zane estava falando de uma pílula venenosa? Em caso afirmativo quais foram os detalhes da série que suportam tal? Se não o que estava acontecendo então?