O que é a falácia de Oberoni?

69

Em minhas viagens pela internet, ocasionalmente vi menções a uma falácia lógica relacionada a jogos de interpretação chamados de Oberoni Fallacy. Qual é essa falácia e de onde ela vem?

    
por DuckTapeAl 22.10.2015 / 23:28

1 resposta

O Oberoni Fallacy é uma falácia informal, ocasionalmente vista em discussões sobre RPG e outros jogos, nos quais um argumentador afirma que, se uma regra problemática pode ser consertada pela figura que executa o jogo, a regra problemática não é, de fato, problemática.

O usuário Oberoni postou originalmente a idéia em 2002 nos fóruns da Wizards of the Coast:

This my my [sic] take on the issue.

Let's say Bob the board member makes the assertion: "There is an inconsistency/loophole/mechanics issue with Rule X."

Several correct replies can be given:

  • "I agree, there is an inconsistency/loophole/mechanics issue with Rule X."
  • "I agree, and it is easily solvable by changing the following part of Rule X."
  • "I disagree, you've merely misinterpreted part of Rule X. If you reread this part of Rule X, you will see there is no inconsistency/loophole/mechanics issue."

Okay, I hope you're with me so far. There is, however, an incorrect reply:

  • "There is no inconsistency/loophole/mechanics issue with Rule X, because you can always Rule 0 the inconsistency/loophole/mechanics issue."

Now, this incorrect reply does not in truth agree with or dispute the original statement in any way, shape, or form.

It actually contradicts itself--the first part of the statement says there is no problem, while the last part proposes a generic fix to the "non-problem."

It doesn't follow the rules of debate and discussion, and thus should never be used.

Simple enough.

    
22.10.2015 / 23:28