Dada a suposta linha do tempo do GOTG Vol. 2, por que Stan Lee alegou ter sido um homem do Fed-Ex?

32
Talvez uma observação excessivamente pedante, no entanto, no cameo dos Guardiões da Galáxia, Stan Lee afirma ter sido um homem Fed-Ex. Esta é presumivelmente uma referência à participação de Stan Lee no final de Captain America: Civil War . Em que Stan Lee é um homem da Federal Express que (humoristicamente) chama Tony Stark "Tony Stank".

No entanto, os Guardiões da Galáxia: Vol.2 devem acontecer logo após os eventos do GOTG Vol.1, muito antes da Guerra Civil e, portanto, antes que o personagem de Stan Lee se apresente como Fed. Ex homem. Então, qual é o problema aqui? A viagem no tempo está envolvida? Stan Lee tem sido um homem da Fed-Ex duas vezes?

    
por Ummdustry 06.09.2018 / 21:26

1 resposta

De acordo com James Gunn, o escritor / diretor de Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 , forneceu uma explicação para isso em uma sessão do Facebook Live com os fãs:

“I actually read the Marvel fan sites and the Marvel message boards out there and a lot of times people have ideas that are somewhat off-base or silly or whatever,” said Gunn. “But one thing I found very funny and interesting is the fact that people thought Stan Lee is a Watcher… and that all of these cameos that he’s doing are part of him being a Watcher. So I thought that was one of the greatest things the fans came up with.”

“So, Stan Lee, as a guy who is either a Watcher – or probably a guy who is working for the Watchers – was something that I thought was fun for the MCU.

“And yes, I know I made a mistake. People have written and asked me, and I'll own up to my mistake because Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 theoretically happens in 2014 which is before [Captain America Civil War]. And Stan Lee in the movie says, ‘That time I was the Fed Ex guy,’ which is what he is in Civil War. I screwed up; I wasn't thinking. That’s all that is.”

“But I'm going to say that – probably – Stan Lee used the guise of a Fed Ex guy more than one time,” laughed Gunn. “So it’s a mistake, but it can easily be explained away!”

Source: IGN

    
07.09.2018 / 00:38