Esta pergunta inclui spoilers do folclore NPC para Curse of Strahd, prossiga por seu próprio risco.
Enquanto dirigia o Curse of Strahd e me preparava para a frente, deparei-me com uma contradição bastante evidente nas histórias de fundo de dois dos NPCs importantes. Gostaria de saber se algo foi dito pelos desenvolvedores sobre isso ...
Essa contradição gira em torno de
Ezmerelda d'Avenir and "Rictavio" (Rudolph van Richten)
Na história de fundo do primeiro, temos esse pequeno trecho referente ao primeiro encontro com o último.
When Ezmerelda was a little girl, her family kidnapped van Richten’s teenage son, Erasmus, and delivered him into the clutches of a vampire. Even today, years later, she can still hear Erasmus’s pleas for mercy. That event haunted her childhood. Van Richten tracked down Ezmerelda’s family soon after the kidnapping, but not before the Vistani had sold the boy. Though van Richten could have done them harm, he instead interrogated Ezmerelda’s mother and father on the whereabouts of his missing son. Satisfied with their answers, he spared their lives before departing with the information they had given him. Ezmerelda witnessed van Richten’s act of mercy and was deeply moved by it.
Curse of Strahd p320
No entanto, em Apêndice F (Apostilas) temos o ...
Journal of Rudolph van Richten
Em que encontramos essa afirmação totalmente contraditória ...
When I found the caravan [that had kidnapped Erasmus], I threatened to set the zombies on the Vistani unless they returned my dear boy. They replied that he had been sold to the vampire, Baron Metus. Something inside me snapped. I released the zombies, and the entire tribe was eaten alive.
Depois disso, continua explicando
That this is where van Richten got is "monsters kill everyone you love" curse.
Eu sei que se você voltar aos livros do AD & D2E Ravenloft, a história do Folheto é como as coisas realmente aconteceram, e o personagem que é o assunto da primeira história é um novo personagem que foi inventado para o Módulo 5E.
Alguma coisa foi dita sobre essa contradição por trás da história? É meio que grande coisa se esses dois personagens forem importantes para o enredo (o que eles farão no jogo que estou executando).
Se a primeira história for verdadeira, então ...
Ezmerelda's family was not killed by van Richten, but the event that should have caused van Richten to get cursed never happened.
Se a segunda história for verdadeira, então ...
Ezmerelda's origin and relationship with van Richten doesn't make sense, as she should have died with the rest of her family...and there was no 'act of mercy' for her to witness that made her want to seek out van Richten.